SOFC monitors student groups with care

I wanted to express my concern over the misconceptions in the Editorial Board’s Sept. 11 editorial, “More groups, more money, more problems,” regarding the Student Organization Finance Committee and Duke Student Government.

Firstly, the new group proliferation does not, as implied by The Chronicle, thin out the annual budget. While it is true that 30 groups have been chartered over the course of last year, this does not guarantee them funding. These groups are welcome to apply, but are not automatically entitled to the annual budget. Furthermore, 19 groups have failed to reapply to the annual budget; in addition, 30 more groups have had their accounts deviated due to inactivity. All of the leftover funding from these 49 groups was therefore promptly transferred back to SOFC. Thus, the 30 new groups do not, after all, divert funds from established groups.

Secondly, SOFC works with the Office of Student Activities and Facilities to meticulously audit groups throughout the year. “Red-flagged” groups are closely monitored and sanctions are immediately levied against groups at the first sign of dubious financial activities. This year, the first auditing sessions will begin in October.

Thirdly, SOFC and DSG do carefully evaluate new student groups. Only groups that add a distinct, unique purpose to Duke will be supported.

With that said, I personally do not believe having too many groups on campus is a negative. The number of student organizations on campus is a true testament to the innovative spirit and leadership ability of Duke students. SOFC’s main priority has been, is, and always will be promoting the growth of student organizations, not limiting their potential.    David Hu Chair, Student Organization Finance Committee