Noia argument insensitive, flawed

Justin Noia's Nov. 1 column declaring that "gay sex is wrong" is insensitive and hurtful.

He begins by questioning why there should be emphasis on gay pride and asks if he should "be proud because I'm white." In that comment he reflects an insensitivity to the difference between being a part of a large majority and being a part of an often vilified minority. Gays are referred to by epithets and long have been made to feel ashamed. "Gay pride" is about gays and lesbians being encouraged to be proud of who they are as human beings and that includes their sexuality.

The rest of Mr. Noia's column expresses opposition to gay marriage. This is based on his assertion that the "social basis for marriage is procreation." But heterosexuals can marry even if one or both are incapable of procreating or they have no interest in having children. And contrary to Mr. Noia's assertion, gay and lesbian couples do have children, through surrogacy, adoption and artificial insemination (all techniques also used by heterosexuals). Marriage is about expressing love and commitment and receiving the many benefits the law bestows on married couples. Sexual orientation should have nothing to do with this.

Mr. Noia says that for expressing his views he will be subjected to "bullying" and "intimidation." He certainly has the right to express his views, but free speech also includes the right of others to criticize him for sounding bigoted and insensitive. If he believes that "gay sex is wrong," he shouldn't have gay sex, but he shouldn't be making pronouncements on the sexuality of others.

Erwin Chemerinsky

Professor, Law and Political Science