I was surprised to find myself and my children ignored in the recent Chronicle article about Duke faculty and Durham ("Professors send children to private, Chapel Hill schools", Dec 6, 2005). Both of my children have spent their entire elementary school careers at E. K. Powe. Both have enjoyed excellent educations, good teachers and enthusiastic administrators. Of course, some years have been better than others, and some of their classmates have struggled more than others, but all in all we've been pleased and proud to have our kids at E.K. Powe.
I was also surprised that the article was lacking a serious analysis of why a school like E.K. Powe underperforms in comparison to other schools, particularly in Chapel Hill. For example, the Chapel Hill public school system is separate from the Orange County system. The high cost of housing and impact of UNC in Chapel Hill results in a very different student demographic than the integrated Durham public school system. The magnet and charter school initiatives in Durham also encourages segregation within the school system, with incentives for parents of means to pull their children out of the district schools like E.K. Powe.
Some of these considerations are just the realities of urban living.
Others are soluble problems that need attention from the school system and the greater Durham community. But the experience of Duke faculty with the Durham public schools cannot be reduced to the simple-minded formula, "Durham schools = bad", implied in the article. Indeed, for this faculty member and his family the experience has been a good one indeed.
Ron Grunwald
Associate Director of Undergraduate Studies,
Biology Dept.
Get The Chronicle straight to your inbox
Signup for our weekly newsletter. Cancel at any time.