I am writing to clarify my position on course evaluations in Pratt School of Engineering as stated in a Feb. 27 Chronicle article. It is necessary to recognize that the nature of engineering courses may be different from that of the range of courses offered in Trinity College, and therefore, a review of the course evaluation for Pratt students would be beneficial. I am strongly in favor of developing a course evaluation system for Pratt, but I do not want to extend SACES to Pratt if it would be possible to create a system tailored more specifically to engineering classes in order to give Pratt students the best tool possible with which to evaluate courses.
Get The Chronicle straight to your inbox
Signup for our weekly newsletter. Cancel at any time.